Strict products liabilitydesign defectaffirmative defensemisuse or modification. Strict product liability is the combined legal concept that results from the marriage of strict liability and product liability. That the defect existed when the product left the defendants possession. Simply because a plaintiff is required to prove less in a strict product liability case compared with a negligencebased action does not mean a defendants liability is automatic. Product liability law in the united states of america. If you have been injured or suffered other damages because of a product you used, you may have a defective product liability claim. Computer software and strict products liability by susan. Whether software can be the subject of a strict liability claim is contentious. In the 1960s strict products liability in tort developed in. Products liability claims are not a given, however. Current product liability test in addition to a breach of warranty claim, under current tort liability theories, a plaintiff could claim that the seller or the manufacturer is liable for a vehicle defect under either strict product liability or. Plaintiff hector suffered injuries from a defective pacemaker that a cedarssinai hospital surgeon implanted during surgery.
Apr, 2012 strict liability 1 software manufacturers should be held strictly liable because. When software is the product that allegedly injures the plaintiff, however, the plaintiff may be barred from recovering under a strict liability argument though negligence is still fair game. General liability insurance sometimes includes coverage for product liability claims. This includes the manufacturer of component parts at the top of the chain, an assembling manufacturer, the wholesaler, and the retail store owner at the bottom of the chain. German companies selling products into the united states should consider legal risks related to product liability. A 3rd partys criminal or intentionally tortious conduct is regarded as an unforeseeable intervening force that supersedes a ds wrongdoing, unless the defect somehow increased the risk that a 3rd party would engage in such. There are a number of ways a strict liability case can fail, or be successfully defended. Quite simply, when software fails and causes bodily injury or property damage, the nature of the products liability claims against the manufacturer is the. Strict liability based on a defective warning can apply to both unavoidably and not unavoidably unsafe products. Apr 16, 2018 strict products liability arises when harm is caused by or threatened by unreasonably dangerous products. Check your policy documents or contact your insurance agent to see if you have software liability coverage.
An exploration of strict products liability and the internet. Product liability is the area of law in which manufacturers, distributors, suppliers, retailers, and others who make products available to the public are held responsible for the injuries those products cause. In addition, a set of commercial statutes in each state, modeled on the uniform commercial code, will contain warranty rules affecting product liability. It is not fully congruent with classical tort or contract law. Strict product liability is a legal rule that says that a seller, distributor or manufacturer of a defective product is liable to a person injured by that product regardless of whether the defendant acted intentionally or negligently. Strict versus negligence software product liability. Developers can be held liable for their code in the same way companies are accountable for a manufacturing defect or defective products.
What you need to know about software liability insureon. Strict liability should be used in litigation dealing as well as regulations on the software projec ts by having authorized certificate of programmers an d the gove rnment performed testing before. Technology developments and the risk of product liability. In contrast to negligence, which focuses on the processes used to produce products, strict liability focuses on the product itself and whether or not it contained one or more unreasonably dangerous defects. An exploration of strict products liability and the internet of things b e n j a mi n c. This pronouncement has caused an uproar among software manufacturers. Products subjected to liability include all consumer goods, medical devices, commercialpersonal vehicles, aircraft and consumable goods such as food and prescription drugs. Strict products liability, negligence liability and proliferation by. The pervasiveness of software quality problems may also explain why it has become fairly common to see software problems give rise to products liability claims.
Restatement of torts 402a 1 one who sells any product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer or to his property is subject to liability for physical harm thereby caused to the ultimate user or consumer, or to his property, if. In 1985 the european community passed a directive ec, 1985 on the strict liability for defective products regardless of whether or not this arose from negligence so that anyone in the supply chain could be sued. There are a number of ways a strict liability case can fail, or. This 1993 software engineering institute sei report explores the effects of software defects. An algorithm for predicting recidivism isnt a product for.
The njpla new jersey products liability act imposes strict liability on manufacturers or sellers of certain defective products. In the example from the practice question, fancy motors will likely be strictly liable for the vehicle defect if it causes an injury. The defendants conduct doesnt matter in order to find fault for an injury under strict. That the product was used in a manner which was reasonably foreseeable by the defendant.
Learn the three types of defective product liability claims. Products liability is a field of tort law which concerns the responsibility of the manufacturer or vendor of a product to ensure that products are safe and do not cause injury. One of its purposes is to ensure that the costs of harm to a person or property of that person or a third party due to a product are borne by the producer of the product. While it is well settled that the law of strict products liability applies to goods and not to services,8 many transactions lie somewhere between a transaction for a product and a transaction for a service, and are referred to as hybrid transactions. See generally leveson, safeware, addisonwesley, 1995. Strict liability 1 software manufacturers should be held strictly liable because. Internet connectivity, software, and autonomous capabilities are increasingly integrated into all manner of devices and objects, creating the so. Software product liability august 1993 technical report jody armour school of law, university of pittsburgh, watts s. Some scholars have wondered whether software is really part of a product or more in the nature of a service performed for a client. A d will be relieved of strict products liability where an intervening force is the sole proximate cause of the harm. Yuba power products power tool threw a piece of wood.
Strict products liability involves the commercial sale of defective products. Apr 22, 2020 16 traditionally, however, strict liability claims only arise from tangible products. It discusses the fundamentals of products liability law and its application to medical device software. Click here to view this article in german german companies selling products into the united states should consider legal risks related to product liability. Humphrey this 1993 software engineering institute sei report explores the effects of software defects. The principle of strict product liability attaches to any party who is involved in placing products in the stream of commerce, whether a manufacturer, wholesaler, distributor, or retailer. This comment examines the problems involved in applying strict products liability law to computer software. In nevada, the elements for a claim strict product liability are. In american standard handbook of software law, john c.
So, here we go with a more detailed look at liability. In the realm of personal injury law, the fault concept of strict liability says that a defendant seller, distributor or manufacturer of a defective product can be liable to anyone injured by that product, regardless of whether the defendant did everything possible to make sure the defect never happened. Strict liability is that part of tort law that covers damage caused by or threatened by unreason ably dangerous products. The illinois court of appeals held that a store would not be held strictly liable for accidents resulting from the use of objects it provided for the mere convenience of its shoppers. Some defects are designrelated, while others involve manufacturing or marketing.
If your general liability policy does not protect you from application defects, you may need to purchase. Gemignani writes that the scenarios predicted by nycum are. Sep 15, 2017 if strict liability is applied more widely in cases involving embedded or massproduced software, this legal development would make it easier for more plaintiffs to prevail in cases involving products like mobile appstheoretically, anyway, since strict liability is usually an easier case for plaintiffs to make than negligence. Strict liability encourages safety restatement of torts 402a 1 one who sells any product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer or to his property is subject to liability for physical harm thereby caused to the ultimate user or consumer, or to his property, if. Computer software and strict products liability by susan lanoue. Significantly, manufacturers are not required to warn of every possible risk, but only those risks that are discoverable in light of the generally recognized and prevailing best knowledge available. Strict liability a manufacturer cannot be held strictly liable for the danger caused by one of its products, if it does not cause the defect in the product. Applying strict products liability to computer software. Spring 2014 mark geistfeld products liability outline. While it is well settled that the law of strict products liability applies to goods and not to services,8 many transactions lie somewhere between a transaction for a product and a transaction for a.
Strict product liability in illinois costa ivone, llc. Strict products liability and the internet of things. Artificial intelligence and machine learningbased medical. Strict products liability and computer software, 8 computer l. Sep 15, 2017 the pervasiveness of software quality problems may also explain why it has become fairly common to see software problems give rise to products liability claims. Mar 09, 2020 the njpla new jersey products liability act imposes strict liability on manufacturers or sellers of certain defective products. Pdf products liability issues for embedded software in. Dec 22, 2019 products liability is a field of tort law which concerns the responsibility of the manufacturer or vendor of a product to ensure that products are safe and do not cause injury. Typically, product liability claims are based on state laws and brought under the theories of negligence, strict liability, or breach of warranty. This comment will examine the possible expansion of strict products.
Courts have struggled with this issue and are likely to split in determining whether software fits as a product. Product liability law in the united states of america news. Strict products liability and computer software, 8. Thus, the threshold question is whether such software may even be susceptible to products liability exposure. Though the range of defective product cases is broad, the claims typically fall into three categories of product liability. She alleged strict liability in her complaint, which the trial court dismissed. Products liability law has become increasingly complex and, in its evolution, the protections created for consumers of unsafe products are being eroded. Follow along for some of the major product liability cases in 2019. The complexity of defending computers and software. The comments to a1 of the restatement products liability note that strict products liability is a term of art that reflects the judgment that products liability is in a discrete area of law which borrows from both negligence and warranty. Therefore, strict products liability cannot be transferred from product to user via contract, which renders infeasible the common practice in the software industry of absolving liability for the vendor through end user licensing agreements. Assessing product liability for software defects in automated vehicles. Strict product liability video the business professor.
This applies to commercial sellers who normally sell. We will concentrate on strict liability, where liability is imposed for reasons other than fault, and product liability, where liability is associated with manufacturers and sellers of defective products to consumers, users and even bystanders. Strict product liability is not automatic liability. In most states, any retail, wholesale, or manufacturer who sells an unreasonably dangerous, defective product that causes injury to a user of the product is strictly liable. If all software is classified as the provision of a service, any strict products liability 4 embedded software is an integral part of a physical. Pdf strict versus negligence software product liability. The rationale for imposing strict liability is based on the fact that the supplier of a defective or dangerous product is in a better position to reduce. This policy will cover the costs of lawsuits caused by software defects, even if the lawsuit is meritless.
Strict liability and product liability is an important practice area of law. Strict liability rules for defective products product. Steven wittenberg the proliferation of automated vehicles sometimes called selfdriving cars 1 or autonomous cars 2 is poised to make american roads safer by reducing or even eliminating human error, which is the leading cause of collisions. Products containing inherent defects that cause harm to a. If your general liability policy does not protect you from application defects, you may need to purchase additional software product liability insurance. However, software or firmware is a list of instructionsnot a tangible item, and the legal arguments that would be used by a plaintiff would not be the same as in a standard products liability. Introduction software manufacturers must become aware of the legal implications which products liability doctrine can have upon their software production. Hundreds of product liability cases involving defective, faulty, hazardous andor dangerous products have been reported, with legal responsibility taking center stage. Relying on restatement of torts section 402a, the california state appellate court held that the hospital was not subject to strict liability for the pacemakers manufacturing defect. If strict liability is applied more widely in cases involving embedded or massproduced software, this legal development would make it easier for more plaintiffs to prevail in cases involving products like mobile appstheoretically, anyway, since strict liability is usually an easier case for plaintiffs to make than negligence. An exploration of strict products liability and the.
Learn about how our product liability and strict liability attorneys can help. Products liability wex legal dictionary encyclopedia. Strict products liability arises when harm is caused by or threatened by unreasonably dangerous products. Hall, note, strict products liability and computer software.
When it comes to product liability, software is like other types of products that you buy, says attorney peri berger, associate at harris beach pllc. Strict products liability and computer software by l. Another form of product liability is strict liability. The complexity in such cases is unnecessary and can be avoided. Strict products liabilitymanufacturing defectcomparative fault at issue vf1201. Strict products liability the modern law of products liability developed from roots in negligence and warranty causes of action. The application of strict products liability to computer software. Overviewproducts liability refers to the liability of any or all parties along the chain of manufacture of any product for damage caused by that product.
967 897 617 263 104 920 657 1024 1404 1600 1221 1499 1473 683 896 524 713 1220 1453 484 25 1369 268 721 882 533 1014 78 1233 703 1225 394 506 144 501 1083 663